Role of Imaging in Diagnosis and Management of COVID-19: A Multiorgan Multimodality Imaging Review.

In this pandemic of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a vast proportion of healthcare resources, including imaging tools, have been dedicated to the management of affected patients; yet, the frequent reports of unknown presentations and complications of disease over time have been changing the usual standard of care and resource allocation in health centers. As of now, we have witnessed multisystemic symptoms requiring the collaboration of different clinical teams in COVID-19 patients' care. Compared to previous viral pandemics, imaging modalities are now playing an essential role in the diagnosis and management of patients. This widespread utility of imaging modalities calls for a deeper understanding of potential radiologic findings in this disease and identifying the most compatible imaging protocol with safety precautions. Although initially used for respiratory tract evaluation, imaging modalities have also been used for cardiovascular, neurologic, and gastrointestinal evaluation of patients with COVID-19. In this narrative review article, we provide multimodality and multisystemic review of imaging techniques and features that can aid in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients.

Prognostic value of pre-hospitalization stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance to predict death in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Inducible ischaemia is a strong marker of vascular vulnerability. Knowing the important role of the vascular tropism of COVID-19 to explain its severity, the presence of a prior inducible ischaemia may be a key pathogenetic determinant of COVID-19 severity. AIMS: To investigate the prognostic value of prior inducible ischaemia on stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to predict death in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients referred for stress perfusion CMR during 1/1/18-1/1/20 who were later hospitalized for COVID-19. The primary outcome was all-cause death, including in-hospital and post-hospitalization deaths, based on the electronic national death registry. RESULTS: Among the patients referred for stress CMR, 481 were hospitalized for COVID-19 (mean age 68.4±9.6years, 61.3% male) and completed the follow-up (median [interquartile range] 73 [36-101] days). There were 93 (19.3%) all-cause deaths, of which 13.7% occurred in hospital and 5.6% were post-hospitalization deaths. Age, male sex, hypertension, diabetes, known coronary artery disease (CAD), the presence of prior inducible ischaemia, the number of ischaemic segments, the presence of late gadolinium enhancement and left ventricular ejection fraction were significantly associated with all-cause death. In multivariable stepwise Cox regression analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.07; P=0.023), hypertension (HR: 2.77; 95% CI: 1.71-4.51; P<0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.08-2.74; P=0.022), known CAD (HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.07-2.94; P=0.025) and prior inducible ischaemia (HR 2.05; 95% CI: 1.27-3.33; P=0.004) were independent predictors of all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 patients, prior inducible ischaemia by stress CMR during the 2years preceding the COVID-19 pandemic was independently associated with all-cause death.

Coronavirus disease-19: The multi-level, multi-faceted vasculopathy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a systemic disease. Mounting evidence depict signs and symptoms involving multiple organs, most of which supported by pathological data. A plausible link to these manifestations is vascular and endothelial dysfunction/damage. However, much of the current knowledge relies on opinion and incipient evidence. We aim to objectively appraise current evidence on the association between COVID-19 and vascular disease, specifically endotheliitis and vasculitis. METHODS: Two researchers independently entered the search terms COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 AND vasculitis, endotheliitis OR endothelium in the following online platforms: MedRxiv and LitCovid (PubMed). The search period was set from November 1, 2019 to August 28, 2020. Manuscripts with unavailable full texts, not in English, mainly on pre-clinical data, presenting only study designs or not directly related to the topics of this review were excluded. Retrospective and prospective studies, especially longitudinal ones, were given priority to the purpose of this review. Since there was paucity of prospective controlled evidence, case reports/series were also considered. RESULTS: A total of 318 manuscripts were initially found. Sixty-seven (21%) were excluded: 59 (18.5%) met exclusion criteria and 8 (2.5%) were duplicates. One hundred and forty-two manuscripts (44,6%) did not provide original data and were also excluded: 35 (11%) were comments, 108 (33.9%) reviews; 1 (0.3%) position paper. One hundred and seven (33.6%) studies were considered for the present scoping review: 81 (25,5%) case reports/series; 18 (5.7%) prospective; 8 (2.5%) retrospective. Viral inclusions in endothelial cells, mononuclear cell infiltrates in the intima of small vessels and markers of endothelial cell apoptosis were demonstrated. Specificities of COVID-19 may lead to diverse vascular manifestations in different levels of the vascular bed. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence indicates that COVID-19 targets vasculature and endothelium. However, high quality data is still lacking and studies with prospective designs and appropriately matched controls are needed.